How to NOT get served

Most people become alarmed when they see a Sheriff’s Deputy approaching their home or their place of employment. But did you know that a divorce complaint can by someone other than a sheriff’s deputy? While there are rules determining who can serve a divorce complaint, any adult who meets the court ordered requirements can be appointed to serve one. You should also know that a divorce complaint can be served in places other than your home or place of employment.

http://liarcatchers.com/process_service.html

To avoid service by either the sheriff or an appointed process server, you can sign an Acknowledgment of Service, saying that you have received a Summons and Complaint, ( only after receiving a file stamped copy of both documents from the court) which starts the divorce process.

If you know that your spouse is going to file for divorce, you can ask them to send you a Summons, Complaint filed and stamped by the court, and anAcknowlegment of Service. Your prompt signature can avoid the embarrassment of a sheriff or process server showing up at your home or place of employment. If you are filing for divorce, you can give your spouse the option to sign an Acknowlegment of Serviceand save the cost of service by the sheriff or an appointed process server.

Make sure that you speak with your attorney about the service process. There are very specific rules for service of a Complaint for Divorce and failure to follow the rules can result in numerous problems, additional costs and delay in the processing of your matter.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on How to NOT get served

Michelle Parker Latest 11/25/11

The family of a mother-of-three who vanished hours after discussing her broken relationship on the People’s Court last week have released her last voicemail in a desperate attempt to find her.
Michelle Parker, 33, of Orlando, Florida, was last seen on November 17 dropping her three-year-old twins off at her ex-fiancé Dale Smith’s home, with whom she had a tumultuous relationship.
Now her family has revealed she left a nine-second message to her father the day before she went missing and wanted him to call her. They have also released new photos of her face and jewelery.
‘Hey Dad, it’s about 8:40. This is Michelle on Wednesday morning,’ she said on the voicemail. ‘I know that you’re at work, but call me when you have lunch or you have break or the end of your day.’
Her father has revealed they had plans to meet up the day after she disappeared, reported WFTV.
The family also released photos of her wearing a cross necklace and ring, with hopes that someone finding the jewellery could lead them to her, reported ABC’s Good Morning America.
Around 50 volunteers helped search for her on Thanksgiving across a two-mile radius from a tower where she last sent a call from her phone, reported the Orlando Sentinel.
‘I’m thankful that my sister has not been found in a bad way, because every day that doesn’t happen, I still have hope that she’s still out there somewhere,’ her sister Lauren Erickson told ABC.
Meanwhile it was revealed Mr Smith was dishonourably discharged from the Marines in 2003 following a reported string of court martials and military convictions for drug possession.
‘Hey Dad, it’s about 8:40. This is Michelle on Wednesday morning. I know that you’re at work, but call me when you have lunch or you have break or the end of your day’
Michelle Parker
They had a ‘violent’ history and he was charged with domestic battery, according to reports. She filed a domestic violence case and restraining order against him in 2009, reported ABC.
In her filing she said he ‘smashed the passenger side window in my SUV’ and ‘took car seats out and threw them in the road’. She also alleged that he yelled to her: ‘Your day is coming.’
‘He gets pretty malicious and vindictive,’ she said of him on The People’s Court, ‘and he’s a mean person especially when he’s been drinking.’ But her restraining order request was refused.
Lack of evidence in her claims of hostility was cited. Police have said that he is not a suspect in her disappearance. However, new details about their tumultuous relationship are now surfacing.
‘Your day is coming’
What Dale Smith allegedly yelled to Michelle Parker
Her friend Angela Launer told ABC Mr Smith was known to abandon her in out of the way places.
‘I know he hurt her many times – dropped her off in areas with no shoes. Took off and left her in Georgia by herself,’ Ms Launer, 34, said, describing their relationship as ‘rocky’ and ‘tense’.
Meanwhile her mother said her daughter was humiliated by her appearance on the reality TV show.
Her distraught family have revealed the impact of appearing on the controversial show, which aired just hours before she disappeared.
Yvonne Stewart told ABC when her daughter returned from filming in the summer she said: ‘It was the most humiliating experience of my life. I don’t even ever want to see it. I wish I had never gone.’
‘It was the most humiliating experience of my life. I don’t even ever want to see it. I wish I had never gone’
What mother Yvonne Stewart claims Michelle Parker told her
Her sister Lauren Erickson had suggested earlier that Mr Smith was an unlikely suspect in her disappearance, but later told Fox News: ‘In my opinion, nobody is ruled out by any means’.
‘Who would want to hurt the mother of their children?’ she said. ‘I don’t see how in any way he would benefit from it.’ Ms Stewart told NBC: ‘I know in my heart of heart that she’s been carjacked.’
‘That the people saw an expensive car and a girl who looks like she has money and I know they’ve made a mistake and I know that they want to fix this and I forgive them.’
‘It’s Thanksgiving. She wants to come home to her babies. We want her home. We forgive you. Please turn her loose. I know for a fact she’s not dead.’
‘It’s Thanksgiving. She wants to come home to her babies. We want her home. We forgive you. Please turn her loose. I know for a fact she’s not dead’
Yvonne Stewart

http://liarcatchers.com/missing_persons_investigations.html

Ms Parker is the mother of an 11-year-old son and two three-year-old twins she had with her Mr Smith. Thursday was a big day since the episode that featured her and him aired at 2pm that day.
The couple fought it out over the lawsuit he filed claiming she lost her $5,000 engagement ring when she threw it at him in a fight at a Hilton hotel during a science fiction convention.
Police said Ms Parker has a ‘violent’ history with Mr Smith, though he is not as a suspect. In the episode, Ms Parker described being grabbed by him and having to call police after a fight.
On the show, Judge Marilyn Milian tells the couple: ‘You’re like drugs to each other. You’re addicted to each other.’
‘You’re like drugs to each other. You’re addicted to each other’
Judge Marilyn Milian
She decried their volatile relationship, saying that each of them needs to move on from their on-again-off again romance that has lasted since 2006.
She added that the pair needs to ‘grow up’ and ‘move on’ for the sake of the three-year-old twins they have together.
Ms Parker’s family reported her missing on Thursday night last week when she didn’t show up for work at 8pm at The Barn restaurant, where she is a bartender.
‘She’s an amazing person and we just want to see her home,’ Lauren Erikson, Michelle’s sister, told WKMG in Orlando.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Michelle Parker Latest 11/25/11

Attorney in HOA fraud

David Amesbury’s life continues to grow more complicated.

The Las Vegas attorney pleaded guilty last month to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud and has agreed to cooperate in the ongoing investigation of corruption inside local homeowners associations and the construction defect industry. The case is being investigated by the FBI, IRS and Metro, and is being prosecuted by the Department of Justice’s Fraud Section out of Washington.

http://liarcatchers.com/fraud_investigation.html

Amesbury admitted receiving kickbacks and helping key players conspire to fix homeowners association elections. He also admitted having a role in a bank loan fraud involving the Courthouse Cafe, which he co-owned with contractor Leon Benzer and former Metro officer Ben Kim, neither of whom has been charged in the investigation.

Just last week the 57-year-old Amesbury was found beaten inside a gated community in Henderson. An FBI spokesman said the battery was not believed to be related to the ongoing investigation of local homeowners associations.

Amesbury was discovered in a state of undress, informed sources say.

Last month, Amesbury was hit with divorce papers from his wife, District Attorney’s office veteran Victoria Villegas. She filed the complaint for divorce Oct. 21, citing incompatibility and irreconcilable differences. She and Amesbury were married Dec. 23, 1991.

The couple has no children.

POPULAR PITCHMAN: Gov. Brian Sandoval is hustling donations and promoting the candidacy of his appointee, U.S. Sen. Dean Heller, via the Internet.

“I wholeheartedly endorse Dean in the race for US Senate,” Sandoval enthuses in his solicitation.

I haven’t yet seen a Sandoval come-on for Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry, whom Sandoval also has enthusiastically endorsed. Perry’s Nevada campaign has essentially flat-lined.

DEPOSITION WARS: Litigation pitting former Las Vegas Sands security personnel against company management is getting nastier. Now attorneys for the company want to find out who leaked a video copy of a deposition in the case to 8 News Now’s George Knapp for a report that embarrassed billionaire casino man Sheldon Adelson.

The defendants’ attorneys are seeking a hearing in an effort to have plaintiff’s attorney Donald Campbell held in contempt for violating the court order of the discovery commissioner, who recommended that “videotaped depositions are not to be shown on YouTube, MySpace or any other similar Internet sites.”

Wrote attorney Patrick Hicks in the motion filed Nov. 17: “If Plaintiff’s counsel provided a copy of Mr. Adelson’s videotaped deposition to 8 News Now for the purpose of posting (or with knowledge that it would be posted) on the Internet, such an act would directly violate the Discovery Commissioner’s Report and Recommendations adopted by order of this Court.”

The deposition videotape indicated that Adelson’s claims — that he feared for his safety during a deposition at Campbell’s law office, and that Campbell “lost his temper during the deposition and attempted to throw books at Adelson” — were laughably unfounded.

The former members of the Adelson family’s security team claim they are owed hundreds of thousands of dollars in overtime pay.

ON THE BOULEVARD: The name of district attorney’s office veteran Roy Nelson, who resigned suddenly last week after 11 years on the job, surfaced during the criminal extortion investigation of Steven Brox, informed sources say. Brox is the owner of United States Justice Associates.

BOULEVARD II: Clark County firefighters are again collecting for their annual holiday toy drive. Starting today, new, unwrapped toys can be dropped off at any county fire station. … Matthew Anderson was a remarkable young man who was deeply involved in community service. You can honor him by participating in the second annual golf tournament to benefit the scholarship fund in his name at UNLV’s PGA Professional Golf Management program within the Harrah Hotel College. For more information about the Monday tournament, call 702-895-3865.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Attorney in HOA fraud

Workers’ Compensation fraud Oak Glen business owners

A Yucaipa couple is being charged with Workers’ Com­pen­sation fraud, according to the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office.

http://liarcatchers.com/workers_compensation_fraud.html

The Workers’ Compensation Fraud Prosecution Unit initiated an investigation in July after an anonymous tip was made involving allegations of possible insurance fraud involving Lois Ventura, 51, of Yucaipa.

The investigation revealed that Ventura had sustained an injury on Aug. 9, 2010, while employed as a manager at Big Cheese Pizza and received Workers’ Compensation benefits as a result of her claim.

While receiving the benefits, Ventura became the co-owner of Apple Dumplin’s in Oak Glen along with Keith McBride, 44 also of Yucaipa.

Despite operating the new business, Ventura reportedly continued to receive cash and medical benefits through the Workers’ Compensation program.

Investigators report that McBride was not only the business co-owner with Ventura, but also her boyfriend.

During an initial interview with McBride, he reportedly misrepresented the facts of the case by stating he was the sole owner of the business and had no knowledge of the Workers’ Compensation benefits Ventura was receiving.

According to investigators, “As evidence revealed that the allegations of Workers’ Com­pens­ation Insurance Fraud were substantiated, charges were sought against both Lois Ventura and Keith McBride for violation of Workers’ Comp­ensation Insurance Fraud and Conspiracy to commit a crime, as well as failing to obtain Workers’ Compensation Insur­ance for the new business.”

Both Ventura and McBride pled “not-guilty” to all counts at their arraignment on Nov. 3. Each was released on their own recognizance are scheduled to appear in court on Jan. 10, 2012.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Workers’ Compensation fraud Oak Glen business owners

daughter finds dad Jack Wagner

Actor Jack Wagner gives up fiancée Heather Locklear and gains a daughter. Is this live “Jeopardy”? The Melrose Place star recently found out that he has a third child, a daughter named Carrie. According to Us Weekly, the young woman was given for adoption when she was just a baby and a while ago she hired a private investigator to find out who her biological parents are.

http://liarcatchers.com/missing_persons_investigations.html

At the age of 52, Jack Wagner was the proud father of two boys. Well he actually was the father of a girl, too, but he didn’t know it until a few weeks ago. Us Weekly reveals that earlier this month, Wagner met his daughter, Carrie, for the first time. She is 23 years old and she came especially to meet him, at a concert in Boca Raton, in Florida.

The story of Carrie is simple, yet so emotional. She was given up for adoption by her birth mother, in the late 80s, when she was just a baby. She never knew who her biological parents were until recently, when she hired a private investigator who managed to track down her father. To her surprise, he was famous.

When he found out about her existence and they met, they were very nervous; they hugged and cried. And they have been inseparable ever since. We cannot help thinking that he will not miss Locklear very much, as he is probably very caught-up in his new father-daughter relationship.

On Thanksgiving, Jack invited Carrie to spend some time with the family.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on daughter finds dad Jack Wagner

The Mall is tracking you

During the upcoming holiday season, two U.S. malls will track the unique identifiers of shoppers cell phones in order to track the movement of shoppers. The Promenade Temecula in southern California and Short Pump Town Center in Richmond Virginia will use a UK company called Footpath Technology to track shoppers movements.

http://liarcatchers.com/electronic_surveillance.html

The company claims that there are no privacy implications because no personal data is collected; the name and phone number of each individual is not collected or tracked back in the companies records, only the unique identifier of the phone is collected and stored. The company uses each phones unique identifier to track the movement of individuals through the mall, and then aggregates and analyzes those data to show the movement of shoppers within a few feet.

Using antennas placed throughout the mall, the surveillance technology can tell which products people paused to look at, and shop owners can then go back and determine how well these products sold.

The malls in question are at least notifying shoppers (using small, printed signs) but there doesn’t appear to be an opt-out mechanism.

The claim that there is no threat to privacy is absurd.Tracking the unique identifier of my phone as I walk into the Gap makes it simple to connect my purchase to that identifier at that particular time. In addition, asking a customer to “like” your company on Facebook in exchange for a discount would also break this thin veil of anonymity.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on The Mall is tracking you

stolen £30m da Vinci recovered by private detectives

The two men pulled up in the driveway of the two-star country hotel, looking for all the world like travelling salesmen stopping off for a night’s rest between appointments. But the rectangular package on the back seat of their car contained something rather more valuable than catalogues or brochures.

http://liarcatchers.com/crime_scene_investigator.html

Only once they were in the privacy of a locked room, the curtains firmly closed, did private detectives Robbie Graham and Jack Doyle dare to unwrap the treasure they had just rescued from the criminal underworld. And then they just sat and stared at it in wonder, scarcely able to believe what they were seeing.
On that October night in 2007, they took snapshots of themselves posing next to it, using a disposable camera bought from Tesco. The photographs show them smiling proudly as they show off their booty against the background of a pink velour headboard, flowery duvet and cheap hotel teacup.
You could barely imagine a more incongruous setting for an oil painting by Leonardo da Vinci.
Extraordinary story: Robbie Graham, and his friend John Doyle, have told the tale of how they ended up becoming involved in the retrieval of the £30m da Vinci masterpiece Madonna Of The Yarnwinder

Thankfully, the Madonna Of The Yarnwinder has found more appropriate settings, returning to public view in Edinburgh in 2009 and now part of the sold-out da Vinci exhibition at London’s National Gallery.
This show promises to be the biggest event in the gallery’s history featuring, as it does, nine of only 15 da Vinci paintings believed to be still in existence. This impressive tally might well have been reduced by one if not for the most bizarre rescue operation in art history.
The story begins eight years ago at Drumlanrig Castle, Dumfries & Galloway, the ancestral seat of 80-year-old John Scott, the 9th Duke of Buccleuch.
More…£16 tickets for Leonardo da Vinci exhibition are selling on the net… for £250

He divided his time between his three stately homes in Scotland and England, travelling in a Volvo painted with the black and gold Buccleuch livery and invariably taking with him the family’s most prized heirloom — the Madonna Of The Yarnwinder.
As his son Richard Scott says: ‘The painting was hugely emotionally important for all of us, but for my father in particular.’
Thought to have been painted by da Vinci between 1501 and 1510, the picture was commissioned by Florimond Robertet, secretary to Louis XII of France.
It was bought in Italy in the 18th century by the third Duke of Buccleuch. But after more than 250 years, the family’s stewardship of the artwork came to an abrupt end on August 27, 2003.
Shortly after 11am that day, two men posing as tourists snatched the £30 million masterpiece from a wall at Drumlanrig Castle and, with the alarm ringing in their ears, made their getaway in a battered Volkswagen Golf.
The theft sparked a worldwide search, with the FBI putting the painting on its list of the ten most wanted pieces of stolen artwork.
Nothing was heard of it until four years later when Graham and Doyle first heard of its existence.
Nicknamed the Silver Fox because of his shock of grey hair, Graham, now 59, owned several pubs in Liverpool and ran the Crown Private Investigations detective agency with Doyle.
As AN offshoot, they set up the website Stolen Stuff Reunited, an online message-board aimed at returning items to their owners for a reward or finder’s fee.
‘It was designed for little things of sentimental value to the people they were taken from, but that were of no use to thieves,’ says Graham. ‘We never dreamed of something like the da Vinci coming along.’
Graham had sunk £30,000 into the website venture, but it was struggling. So, the friends were excited when they learned of what seemed to be an extraordinary opportunity.
One night, Doyle, now 62, was approached in a pub by a man called ‘J’, who had received information from a man known only as Frank.
The word in the Liverpool underworld was that a businessman had been given the stolen painting as security on a £700,000 property deal that had subsequently collapsed.
Nearly three-quarters of a million pounds out of pocket, he had let it be known in certain circles on Merseyside that he would return the painting to its rightful owner in exchange for that amount.
Graham and Doyle saw their opportunity and decided they should be the ones to organise its recovery. ‘We just thought it would be the best advert for our website,’ says Graham. ‘If you could get a da Vinci back, you could get anything back.’
Unsure of the legal issues involved, they consulted local solicitor Marshall Ronald, who contacted a law firm in Glasgow on their behalf.

‘We were completely up front and open from the word go and asked for legal advice every step of the way because we knew we were in a grey area,’ says Doyle.
At the suggestion of the Scottish lawyers, an email was sent to a loss adjuster for the duke’s insurance company. He passed them on to a man called John Craig, who claimed to be representing the Duke. But, as they would later discover, he was far from what he seemed.
Craig agreed a reward fee of £2 million. Of this, £700,000 would go to the man in possession of the painting and the rest would be divided between Ronald, Graham and Doyle, and the go-betweens Frank and J.
The first step was for those holding the painting to prove it was the real thing — so, they produced a ‘proof of life’ video of the kind more usually associated with kidnappings.
‘They filmed the painting laying on a bed with that day’s newspaper next to it,’ says Graham.
‘Then a man’s hand appeared and turned it over to show all the markings and writing on the back, which proved it was genuine.’
It was encouraging to know the Madonna was still in one piece but, sadly, the duke would not live to see the return of the painting that meant so much to him — he died after a short illness in September 2007.
Graham and Doyle were told the retrieval should still go ahead. All they needed was the cash to pay the holder of the painting. This was provided by Ronald, who told them he had borrowed it from a friend.
So it was that one of the most unlikely transactions the art world has ever known unfolded.
On October 3, 2007, with several plastic bags of banknotes stuffed in the boot of his S-type Jaguar, Graham drove to the car park of a Merseyside pub, where he gave the cash to the go-betweens.
‘I didn’t know who these people really were and I didn’t want to know,’ he says. ‘If they had tried to tell me, I wouldn’t have listened. I wasn’t there to catch criminals; I was there to get the painting back.’
 They agreed to act as a go between in order to get the painting back from a criminal on Merseyside and return it to its rightful owner
Four hours later, once the go-betweens had examined the money for tracking devices and to make sure it wasn’t counterfeit, Graham and Doyle met them in another car park, where the painting was handed over in a large pink box.
After checking it was, indeed, the Madonna, the pair wrapped it in protective acid-free tissue paper provided by Ronald, put it in a port-folio case and placed it on the back seat of the Jaguar.
‘It was unbelievable to think we had a Leonardo in the car,’ says Graham. ‘I rang Marshall Ronald and said: “The lady is on her way.” ’
They were due to deliver the painting that evening to the offices of the Glasgow lawyers who had advised them on how to proceed, but a heavy rainstorm forced them to abandon their journey just outside Dumfries, 80 miles short of their destination.
Tragic: The 9th Duke of Buccleuch, who owned the home where the painting hung, died one month before it was discovered
And so they stayed overnight at that country hotel, with the painting perched on a dresser.
‘It was a weird night,’ says Graham. ‘We went through every emotion. We got a bit scared, we even got a bit religious, because it’s a religious painting, isn’t it? We didn’t really sleep at all.’
The next morning, with Graham wearing his lucky tie and the Madonna once again on the back seat of the Jaguar, the two men finally reached the Glasgow law firm and handed over their prize to the late Duke’s representative, John Craig.
But far from receiving their invitation to a grand re-hanging ceremony at Drumlanrig Castle as they had been promised, they were in for a shock. Within minutes, the room was full of policemen.
Graham and Doyle were handcuffed and taken into custody. They soon discovered why.
Far from looking out for their interests, Ronald, who was also arrested, had become obsessed by the fortune he believed he could make from what he referred to as the ‘art project’. As was later revealed in court, unbeknown to Graham and Doyle, he had negotiated himself a secret extra payment of £2.5 million — or so he thought.
In fact, John Craig was an undercover policeman who had recorded conversations in which Ronald described the underworld figures they were dealing with as ‘volatile people’ who might ‘do something very silly’ if the painting was left in their hands.
By saying this, he was perceived to be in some way threatening the duke’s family that the Madonna would be destroyed if millions weren’t paid for its return.
Thus he laid not only himself but Graham and Doyle open to charges of extortion.
It took two-and-a-half years for the case to come to court, during which time Graham and Doyle’s businesses were seriously disrupted and their debts mounted.
And during the eight-week trial, which began in March 2010, Doyle’s elder brother Joe and Graham’s wife Susan passed away.
‘My wife died not knowing if I was found guilty or not guilty,’ says Graham.
Investigation: Robbie and John were both arrested by officers after the exchanged and charged with extortion. They were later found not guilty after an eight-week trial
‘When we got the painting, it had been wrapped in a white sheet that had all the indentations and markings from the frame on it. I kept that in the car and when my wife was cremated I put it in the coffin with her. I thought it might get her a few brownie points with the big fella.’
Back in court, the case hinged on whether ‘John Craig’ had infiltrated an existing conspiracy or led them into a trap.
And while the police had taped conversations they believed suggested there had been a conspiracy, Graham had recorded a meeting in which Craig assured them about the legitimacy of the operation.
At the end of the trial, the jury found in their favour: Graham, Doyle and Ronald were cleared. In court, however, it was revealed that far from borrowing the money needed to pay off the man who had the painting, Ronald had taken it from his law firm’s client account.
He was subsequently struck off for doing so.
‘He was guilty of being a very greedy man,’ says Graham.
The two private detectives continue to insist they are entitled to a reward for recovering the painting and have offered to take lie-detector tests to remove any doubts the current duke might have about their entitlement to it.
Asked about this last week, a spokesman for the Buccleuch estate declined to comment.
Graham has been talking to a scriptwriter about the possibility of a TV drama based on their story. And remarkably, for all the trouble she brought them, he is hoping to renew his acquaintance with the Madonna.
Since the pair were not invited to the opening of the London exhibition earlier this month, and the advance tickets have sold out, that is unlikely to happen any time soon.
‘I would like to have gone and seen it again,’ says Graham. ‘After all, we did spend the night together

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on stolen £30m da Vinci recovered by private detectives

STOP paying to trace cell phone

Want to know who’s calling your cell? You no longer need to hire a private detective, no matter how tempting that may seem. Instead you can perform a number of completely cost free searches either by yourself or with the assistance of a company.

http://liarcatchers.com/electronic_surveillance.html

The biggest, cheapest and easiest cell phone number directory on earth is right under your fingers. The Internet, your first port of call for information of any type, should also be the first place you look to see if you can identify the owner of the cell phone that is calling you.

Lots of supposedly private information is freely available on the Internet. That’s because people give out their personal information to companies and clients all the time, without thinking about it once: and if they’ve included a phone number in that information then your typing it in should pull up names, addresses, anything associated with instances of that combination of numbers.

If a simple Internet search doesn’t work, don’t worry. This is only the start of your odyssey. Your next step is to find any one of the hundreds of free websites that allow you to hunt for cell phone numbers without paying.

Hunting for cell phone numbers in this way requires a bit more digital legwork, but of course that can be quite exciting too! For example, a free cell phone directory is likely to give out limited information about the number in question, which means that you will be using the results you generate as a starting point. The most common information carried on a free cell phone directory listing is the provider that owns the phone number and the location of the phone, as registered on the bills.

You can then call up some free reverse directories (you may have to wade through a ton of cell phone reviews on these sites, which pay for their services with advertising) and find out more. If you enter your information you get to do some free searches. Bear in mind that along with cell phone reviews and exhortations to buy phones popping out at you from every angle, by giving your information to the site you are pretty much guaranteed to get endless sales calls and digital voices phoning you up in the middle of the night, to tell you that you have won some improbable prize.

There are also volunteer directories (which again tend to use hundreds of cell phone reviews and ads to pay for themselves) you can try. A volunteer directory only lists the numbers of people who have voluntarily put their cell phone information into them. If you can’t find the number there it is because it has not been volunteered.

If all else fails and your need is urgent, pay. The more you pay the more likely you are to get quick and reliable results. All of which, of course, leads you to an inescapable conclusion: no matter how well you hide your numbers, someone somewhere can track you down in a heartbeat. It’d be more appealing just sticking to those cell phone reviews, I think!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | 1 Comment

Justin D. Hodson appointed to Crime Stoppers Board of Directors

Respected Orange County private investigator, Justin D. Hodson, CPI has been appointed to the Board of Directors for the Orange County Crime Stoppers.

http://liarcatchers.com/crime_scene_investigator.html

There are more than 300 Crime Stoppers organizations in the United States and over 1,400 worldwide. This program has proven to be an asset to any community, with over 850,000 arrests made, over 1.2 million crimes cleared, and $8 billion in property and drugs recovered in the last 33 years. Police departments in Orange County have partnered with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department and Crime Stoppers.

The anonymity of tipsters of a crime is guaranteed because calls are received at a Call Center using a toll free number: 1-855-TIPS-OCCS. All phone lines are encrypted and no phone calls are ever recorded. Tips are then sent on to OC Crime Stoppers for further evaluation.

Tips sent by e-mail have unique integrated Two-Way Dialog capabilities that allow the tipster to go back and provide additional information to the tip at any time, but also provide a secure means for the coordinator to ask questions of the tipster through the same secure and encrypted interface. This is just the beginning of a new way for the public to join the fight against crime and it will hopefully mean the end of many a criminal.

Orange County Crime Stoppers is looking for volunteers to serve on its Board of Directors and Advisory Committee members. If interested in supporting Orange County Crime Stoppers contact Justin D. Hodosn, CPI at Jhodson@GaileyAssociates.com or 714-622-1904.

Justin Hodson is the Vice President and Director of Surveillance at Gailey Associates, Inc., a professional investigations firm based in Orange County and Los Angeles, California.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Justin D. Hodson appointed to Crime Stoppers Board of Directors

gps on employee YES

A New York appeals court ruled Wednesday that the state was justified in placing a GPS device on an employee’s private car without his knowledge and monitoring him for several weeks to determine whether he was submitting fraudulent time cards.

http://liarcatchers.com/electronic_surveillance.html

The case – Michael A. Cunningham v New York State Department of Labor – is just the latest to raise the question of location tracking by the government. The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard arguments over whether police needed a warrant before attaching a GPS device to a suspect’s car and monitoring him 24 hours a day for a long period of time. And magistrate judges across the U.S. have been facing similar decisions on the tracking of cellphones.

In the New York case, which Reuters reported earlier Wednesday, the Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, ruled 3-2 that the state acted “reasonably” when it conducted the GPS tracking.

In 2008, the Labor Department suspected that Mr. Cunningham was “taking unauthorized absences from work as well as falsifying time records,” according to the decision. The department “had an investigator attempt to tail” Mr. Cunningham when he left his office during work hours, but “the effort was thwarted” when he realized he was being followed, the court wrote.

So the state’s Office of the Inspector General conducted an investigation that included subpoenaing Mr. Cunningham’s E-Z Pass records and placing the GPS device on his car when it was in a parking lot near his office. Mr. Cunningham was later fired.

In its ruling, the court pointed out that it is not possible for the Inspector General’s office to get a warrant in such a case, because it isn’t a criminal matter. Instead, in this type of investigation by the state, searches are judged by whether they are “reasonable,” the court wrote.

The New York Court of Appeals, which is a higher court than the Appellate Division, ruled in 2009 that the use of a GPS device generally requires a warrant supported by probable cause. But because court decisions at the time of the 2008 investigation said such GPS devices could be used without a warrant, it wasn’t unreasonable for the state investigators to think their search was justified, according to the Appellate Division’s majority opinion.

The majority also wrote that although the GPS device was on Mr. Cunningham’s car 24 hours a day, the information extracted from them was relevant to his “location during work hours.” In a dissenting opinion, Justice Edward Spain wrote that the GPS evidence was “obtained by an unconstitutional search.” Mr. Cunningham will be able to appeal.

Mr. Cunningham is being represented by the New York Civil Liberties Union, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Labor Department also did not immediately respond to a similar request.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on gps on employee YES