Who is performing your background checks?

BOISE, Idaho – Nampa Christian High School custodian James Kopp has been put on administrative leave following battery and attempted kidnapping charges.

http://liarcatchers.com/background_checks.html

Boise Police say a woman was crossing the street near 13th and Main Street early Saturday morning when the 57-year-old Kopp got out of his vehicle and punched her in the head – knocking her to the ground.

Kopp was arrested later that night on I-84. Police say he was speeding and he appeared to be intoxicated.

Court records show this isn’t his first brush with the law, however.

But the school’s principal says, despite their background check, the man’s prior convictions didn’t show up.

Prosecutors say Kopp, a janitor at Nampa Christian High School for the past six years, was convicted in California years ago of battery with serious bodily harm, false imprisonment, and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon.

An Idaho law passed three years ago requires all public school employees who come in contact with students to go through a criminal background check.

A previous felony is grounds to not hire the applicant.

It’s up to each school district to decide whether to hire someone convicted of a crime.

But that law doesn’t apply to private schools in Idaho.

Although Nampa Christian High School isn’t required to conduct background checks, Principal Kevin Rex tells KBOI-TV they do it anyway.

And in this case, he says Kopp’s California convictions didn’t show up.

Rex says the school takes this very seriously and put Kopp on administrative leave right after this weekend’s arrest.

The school issued this statement:

“NCS is conducting its own review of this situation and will follow protocol and any future recommendations regarding this matter.”

KBOI 2 News will continue to investigate why Kopp’s previous record was not found on a background check.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Who is performing your background checks?

Suspect in local charity burglary case seen surveillance

AUSTIN — A local charity is burglarized three times in one night. Now, the people who manage the Central Texas Chapter of Big Brothers Big Sisters are hoping surveillance video helps them find the burglar.

http://liarcatchers.com/electronic_surveillance.html

Surveillance video taken from inside the Big Brothers Big Sisters facility at 1400 Tillery Street in East Austin Tuesday morning shows a male burglar squeezing through the window he had broken next to the door. After peering over the receptionist counter, the first thing he puts in his duffel bag is a bowl full of candy. He then makes his way through the building stealing much more than candy.

“We lost several laptops and some A/V equipment like an LCD projector,” said Brent Fields/CEO of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Texas. “The part that really hurts is there were five, brand new bicycles that were promised to kids on our program that were stolen.”

Police say the man came back twice after officers finished their initial investigation.

“The suspect returned at 3:40 a.m. and burglarized the place again,” said Veneza Aguinaga, a Senior Police Officer with APD. “Then officers responded to that. When officers left again at 4:20 a.m., the suspect returned.”

Three weeks ago, Big Brothers Big Sisters managers say their air conditioning units were the targets of multiple burglaries.

“We had somebody stealing some copper piping from our outside air conditioning unit, and they came back and did it again,” said Fields.

Fields estimates all of the repairs and replacements will cost thousands of dollars. Geneva, whose last name has been withheld, has been a little sister in the program for more than five years, knows it’s the kids who will feel the loss.

“It makes me mad because this organization is so big and so many kids look forward to it,” she said. “It just makes me feel so sad that somebody out there would go and take stuff that helps kids. It just hurts.”

If you’d like to help Big Brothers Big Sisters, go to their website.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Suspect in local charity burglary case seen surveillance

private investigator hired

ALPHARETTA, Ga. —
City officials said they have handed off the investigation of an attack on a child at an Alpharetta park. The 4-year-old’s mother said she is pressing charges after a man slammed her daughter to the ground to make way for his grandchild.

http://liarcatchers.com/civil_investigations.html

Channel 2 Action News has confirmed the man under investigation is Alpharetta City Council Member Cheryl Oakes’ husband, Paul Oakes. Channel 2’s Craig Lucie sat down with 4-year-old Hadassah Abdelmaseh, who explained what happened on Oct. 15 in her words.

“I got scared. That guy slammed me on the ground, and I get a bad boo-boo on my head and my eyes swell too. The guy just slammed me on the ground,” Abdelmaseh said with her mother nearby.

Her mother said the girl was swinging on her belly at Wills Park when the man declared it was his granddaughter’s turn. Abdelmaseh said the man lifted the swing by its chains and shook it until she fell off. Channel 2 obtained the Alpharetta police report that names Paul Oakes several times
After calling police, Christole Abdelmaseh, Hadassah’s mother, said she thought it was odd the way the responding officers acted during their investigation at the Wills Park playground. Department procedures require dispatched officers to file a written report and interview witnesses, but no report was written.

“They were chit-chatting with him over in the corner against the fence like they were good buddies,” Abdelmaseh told Lucie.

She said she asked police to write a report, but they said nothing could be done. She filed her own report the next day.

Paul and Cheryl Oakes both work with child advocacy charities and sit on the Alpharetta Public Safety Foundation board. Christole Abdelmaseh said she spoke with Cheryl Oakes on the phone after she wrote her a letter about her daughter.

“She said, ‘Well if there’s absolutely anything that we can do to make you happy, you just let us know and we’ll take care of it to get this closed,’” Abdelmaseh said.

Late Tuesday, Paul Oakes, his attorney and a hired private investigator met with Channel 2’s Mike Petchenik to address the allegations. T.J. Ward claimed the allegations and the ensuing media coverage were a “political smear campaign.”

“There are former political figures in Alpharetta who know they can damage a political figure in this matter and have been motivating this case that’s come up against Mr. Oakes, which is frivolous,” said Ward.

When Petchenik questioned how Abdelmaseh, who lives in Roswell, would have a stake in Cheryl Oakes’ reelection, attorney Lee Whiteside said he believed they would find out how through an independent investigation.

“I think there’s something really sinister behind this and we plan to find out,” he said.

According to police notes, Oakes admitted to officers he removed the girl from the swing but said he placed her on the ground. But his lawyer told Petchenik he never touched the girl.

“This man is above reproach,” said Whiteside. “His character is as intact today as it was that day, and we’re not gonna stand for this.”

Abdelmaseh brushed off the notion that her allegations were politically motivated.

“Because I’m that bored with my three children, you have got to be kidding me,” she texted Petchenik. “That is bad timing on his behalf.”

She denied that Oakes’ former opponent had ever contacted her regarding the case.

Police have not charged anyone.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on private investigator hired

Manage a Large Fire Scene Investigation

Conducting a successful large loss fire investigation requires a combination of pre-planning and cooperation in dealings with public sector officials.

It also means having previously identified a qualified expert familiar with large, not small, fire losses.

A word from our sponsor:
When it’s time for point-of-service productivity, you need a tablet that works as hard as you do. Introducing the Motion® CL900 Tablet PC, the only serious solution for companies that need to keep their mobile workers productive and connected. See the CL900 in action.
That’s according to panelists at the Property Loss Research Bureau Large Loss Conference held in Chicago, Ill.

Immediate attention to an expert’s qualifications provides an adjuster or carrier the opportunity to retain an expert in advance of a loss, giving an adjuster a leg up during an investigation, the presenters said. This way, an adjuster avoids a situation where qualified experts have already been retained by other parties involved in the claim.

The presenters recommended having a screening or vetting process for experts in place that includes:

Identifying the role the expert will have during a scene investigation
Identifying the methodology the expert will use to investigate a large fire loss
Evaluating the selection process used to identify and retain qualified experts
Requesting the expert’s compliance with the National Fire Protection Association 1033 (NFPA), the standard for professional qualifications for fire investigators
Requesting the expert’s compliance with NFPA 921, the guidelines for fire and explosion investigations
Selecting counsel and engineers qualified in large fire loss investigations
Adjusters and carriers should screen by individual investigator, not by firm, the presenters said. They also recommended knowing the lab the expert uses for tests and how evidence is stored.

When reviewing a curriculum vitae, Jason Karasinski, senior fire investigator for Liberty Mutual’s Home Office Fire Investigation Unit, goes as far as calling an expert’s references.

It’s important for an adjuster to be present during a scene investigation, Karasinski said. At the scene, an adjuster can observe how experts interact with each other and which expert takes charge of the investigation. Besides this being opportunity to find a better qualified expert, it also allows an adjuster to confirm that an expert is doing a good job. “Make sure they do it and that they do it right,” Karasinski said of an expert’s fire scene investigation.

Things to Consider During a Fire Investigation
According to the presenters, if an adjuster or expert is on scene during fire suppression, he or she should make sure to photograph the crowd, as well as interview witnesses, including first responders. “In a couple of cases I’ve photographed the arsonist,” said M. Dixon Robin, special agent and certified fire investigator with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

While firefighters work to extinguish the fire, adjusters and experts can work to gather zoning board and planning documents, assess the presence of surveillance cameras and site security, research recent law enforcement activity, and find out who is responsible for property maintenance.

The presenters said it is acceptable to videotape a fire scene during an investigation; however, they did caution adjusters to make sure that the audio is in the off position, since early discussions of a cause may not be part of the final determination.

Coordinating an investigation with public sector officials is extremely important, according to the presenters. Public agencies usually have standard procedures in place for processing a large fire loss. They said these should not be secret, they can be shared with the adjuster or retained expert on scene.

Public agencies will grant private sector investigators limited access to the scene in order to prevent spoliation. Instead of seeing this as a roadblock, adjusters should maintain cooperation. Knowing that experts and adjusters will be bound by the rules of the scene and escorted by law enforcement should help an adjuster prepare in advance. Have a helmet and respirator on hand, Robins said. OSHA may ask for hazard documentation, like certifications and training. He recommended taking these to the scene every time; otherwise an expert may not gain access to a scene.

Because local agencies don’t have the time or money to do testing, Robins and Karasinski said adjusters should include them in on the testing. “Always invite a public sector fire investigator to lab exams to educate them,” Karasinski said.

Robins recommended that adjusters be aware of contamination issues. “Know what heavy equipment was used on a scene by public investigators,” he said. Knowing whether a piece of equipment is gas or diesel-powered can help distinguish contaminants from accelerants that may have been used to start the fire.

As a courtesy, Robins recommended adjusters give a heads-up to public investigators regarding any interviews planned. “Arson is such a confession driven crime,” Robins said. “If you schedule it [an examination under oath], sometimes they will lawyer up.”

Once the Fire is Out
An adjuster needs to take control of a large fire scene immediately upon receipt of the reported claim. “As the adjuster handling the case, you need to establish control of the scene and you need to do it right away,” said Michael J. Famiglietti, large loss team manager for the New England region of Liberty Mutual Insurance Companies. He said this is critical to subrogation.

http://liarcatchers.com/arson_investigation.html

If an investigation concentrates on a portion of a building, it is important to mitigate other damage. “Secure a section of a building and mitigate the rest of it while third party carriers are put on notice and investigation continues,” Famiglietti said. Subrogation recovery may not be viable if mitigation is not done in a timely fashion, he said.

Karasinski recommended involving the liability team early on in the claim. “Just because a fire starts at your location doesn’t mean it’s your fault,” he said. “It’s important to have the liability team consider liability exposure when you are on the scene.”

Subrogation Considerations
To enhance any subrogation that might be pursued, Karasinski reiterated the necessity of getting the liability team on board early to investigate. As an example, the presenters discussed an investigation involving an apartment building fire. At first glance, it appeared a cigarette discarded in a flower pot on the porch nine hours before started the fire. But arc mapping determined the cause of the fire was the light fixture above the flower pot.

Karasinski also suggested insurers review the number of similar losses in the aggregate, including ones handled in other states. If similar losses are found, adjusters will need to determine how many involve the same manufacturer. In the case of similar losses, using the same people for each claim will help carriers in their pursuit of subrogation. “It’s extremely important to use the same experts, same legal team, same lab, and you are going to start winning cases,” he said.

Famiglietti recommended adjusters be proactive during a large loss fire investigation. “Think of the tools and resources that you need,” he said.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Manage a Large Fire Scene Investigation

murder trial with help by private investigator

The first policeman to arrive at the Westville home of murdered couple Magdalena and Johannes Lotter found their children, Nicolette and her brother, Hardus, seated at the dining room table with Nicolette’s former boyfriend, Mathew Naidoo.

http://liarcatchers.com/wrongful_death.html

The three are accused of killing Magdalena and Johannes by assaulting and strangling them on July 19, 2008, at their Westville home.

The trial started on Monday at the Durban High Court, with the State calling Detective Inspector Justice Jabulani Duma, the first of 22 witnesses expected to give evidence.

All three accused have pleaded not guilty to the double murder.

It is the State’s case that the premeditated murder was committed to gain an inheritance.

“When I arrived, the body of Johannes was covered in a white sheet in the passage. There was an electric cord around his neck and he was lying face-down.”

Matthew naidoo, co-accused in the Lotter murder case. Picture: Gcina Ndwalane

INLSA
Duma said he noticed bloody handprints on the wall next to where the father lay, naked.

Next to the mother, Duma saw a black-handled knife. He said the mother had a stab wound to her throat and a cellphone charger cord wrapped around her shoulder. There was blood on the floor.

Duma said he photographed several cuts and bruises on Hardus’s hands.

Hardus told Duma that two men invaded their home, locked him in his room and then killed his parents. He said the cuts on his hands were as a result of the scuffle with the men.

However, in a confession submitted to the court, Nicolette said: “We spoke about what we had to do. I will admit that both my brother and I believed that Mathew is the third son of God.” Nicolette said the three had discussed and agreed to Naidoo’s plan to kill her parents using a Taser and syringe, to inject air into their veins to induce a heart attack.

Duma, who was the photographer at the scene of the crime, said he knew all three accused and the deceased before the murders took place.

He said in June, Johannes opened a case of intimidation at the Westville Police Station after Nicolette and Hardus were apparently robbed.

In May 2008, Duma said Nicolette opened a charge at the Durban North police station and reported that she was accosted by two men in a Volkswagen who threatened to kill her parents.

A month later, her brother reported that while riding his bike, two men in a Volkswagen broke his cellphone and made similar threats.

Duma said he interviewed the family and Naidoo because the father said he had received threatening smses.

Duma said he could not establish anything and Johannes engaged the services of a private investigator.

In her confession, Nicolette said syringes were bought from Clicks and three sets of gloves from McPharmacy at the Pine Crest Centre in Pinetown.

Vignesan Naicker, a qualified pharmacist, submitted to the court a receipt for a syringe sold to “M Naidoo” on July 19.

Naicker said it was a legal requirement to take details of anyone purchasing medication and no verification was required.

Under cross-examination by advocate Roland Parsotham, representing Hardus, Naicker said the profile of a person was captured on the Clicks system but there was no way of knowing for certain that it was a M Naidoo who made the purchase.

In a statement read out in court yesterday by Vijay Sivakumoor, representing Naidoo, Naidoo said he was not involved in the planning or killing of the Lotter couple and was forced by police to confess to a crime he was not aware of.

Taking the matter into a trial-within-trial, Sivakumoor said his client would give evidence that he was not informed of his legal rights and was put under duress by police who assaulted him.

The State called Warrant Officer Peter George from the Cato Manor organised crime unit, who said he read Naidoo his rights.

George said Naidoo was not assaulted in his presence and described Naidoo, whom he said he had a lengthy conversation with, as an “intelligent somebody”.

The trial continues.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on murder trial with help by private investigator

Real Life Paid Hero body guard

SUBANG JAYA: Despite being slashed with a parang, a businessman’s bodyguard shot and injured two men in an attempted robbery in Jalan SS13/1K, USJ1 here yesterday.

http://liarcatchers.com/executive_protection.html

The incident happened at 4.30pm when the businessman, who is a ‘Datuk’, had gone to his scrap metal yard behind the Summit USJ Shopping Mall with his brother and the bodyguard to finalise a business deal.

Subang Jaya district acting police chief Supt Tan Ah Chua said they waited in the businessman’s car outside the scrap metal yard.

When a lorry arrived, the businessman got out of his car to have a discussion with two workers inside the lorry.

It is believed they were discussing a business deal involving 12 tonnes of copper. The businessman had brought along a briefcase containing RM200,000.

When the discussion ended about five minutes later, a man in his 20 suddenly approached the businessman and ordered him to open the briefcase.

“Fearing for his life, the businessman opened the briefcase when a car with four men inside arrived and parked beside his car,” said Tan.

At this point, the man who ordered the businessman to open his briefcase fled, and three men, who were armed with an axe and parangs, got out of their car and stormed the businessman’s car. They attacked the bodyguard who was inside the car with the businessman’s brother.

“The 44-year-old bodyguard was slashed on his right arm and thigh but he managed to pull out his pistol and fire four shots,” said Tan.

The shots hit two robbers in their abdomen but the other two escaped without the loot.

Police, who were alerted, detained five suspects — the two injured robbers, the man who ordered the businessman to open the briefcase and the two men in the lorry.

They also issued an alert to hospitals and clinics as they believe one of the two robbers who escaped had sustained a gunshot wound.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | 1 Comment

IS your school district following you?

For more than a month, Carolyn Thompson suspected someone was tailing her to and from her son’s school.

http://liarcatchers.com/studentresidency.html

One day after picking him up from Tevis Junior High, she made random turns and still the four-door sedan was behind her.

After she got to her apartment, the car parked outside it. The car was still there when she took her son to school the next morning.

“It was scary, because I didn’t know if someone was trying to hurt us,” she said.

In the end she learned she was indeed being stalked — not by a criminal but by a private eye hired by a school district.

And now she has filed complaints that may lead to lawsuits.

Thompson was the target of a little known exercise in which school district attorneys hire investigators to track the activities of parents to see if they really do live in the district. In her case, the Panama-Buena Vista Union School District suspected she didn’t live within its boundaries, according to a claim Thompson filed with the state.

Covert operations of this type are not unprecedented for schools here or elsewhere, said Grant Herndon, lead counsel for a company called Schools Legal Service.

The Bakersfield-based service advises many local schools and colleges. And tailing people is something the company “occasionally” does when it needs an objective third-party to investigate matters during potential lawsuits, he said.

Some lawyers familiar with school policies were startled by the disclosure.

Arturo Revelo, a local attorney who has worked on school-related cases, called the operation a “violation of privacy.”

“And it’s a total waste of public resources,” he said.

It’s not immediately clear if the district’s spying will be cost-effective. Special education students can cost districts as much as four times the cost of education most students. But the bill for the espionage is unknown, and legal costs seem almost certain in this case.

Nicole Hodge Amey, Thompson’s Los Angeles-based attorney, devotes a significant share of her work to special education cases in Southern California.

She said she has never had a client followed by a school agency.

In this case, the private eye — a former Kern County sheriff’s deputy and Bakersfield police officer — followed Thompson around for a month starting in April. She did live within Panama’s boundaries for several years, but had to move just outside them last school year because of financial problems.

“If there’s some question as to residency, we can have that checked out,” Herndon said. “Investigators follow a code of ethics and are very respectful.”

Thompson, not feeling very respected, has filed a separate complaint against the district for emotional distress.

That’s in addition to a complaint against Panama, filed before the legal team had someone follow her, alleging the district wasn’t providing her son adequate special education services, which are very expensive.

“I feel like they violated my rights,” Thompson said. “All I wanted … was for him to go to school and get an education.”

Residency

It’s no secret that some parents lie about their home address to get their kids into schools with better test scores or sports programs than their home campus or district.

If they choose to obey the rules, parents can ask for an interdistrict transfer. It’s up to each district school board to approve or deny those requests based on capacity, for example.

If school officials suspect parents aren’t following the rules, they’ll try to seek out the truth.

The superintendent of the Fruitvale School District, the highest-achieving school district in Kern County, chose not to disclose those tactics but said he’s never used a private investigator.

“When inconsistencies are brought to the district’s attention, staff will re-look at the particular situation and determine what would be the appropriate information needed to confirm parent residency in the district,” Superintendent Carl Olsen said. “This may include additional paperwork or a home visit.”

Norris School District — a close second for highest achieving in Kern — borrowed its residency policies from Fruitvale. California’s education code on residency also guides districts. For example, parents can only choose one residence for a child.

Norris finds that parents of about 30 to 40 students each year — out of about 3,700 — don’t live in the district. Many of them “test score shop,” Superintendent Wally McCormick said.

“It’s not a huge problem, but it’s an irritant,” McCormick said. “Our board believes that our local schools are for the local community, for our local taxpayers. Why should someone else benefit from (their taxes)?”

Norris allows students who have gone to its schools, but moved away, to continue to attend — barring behavior or attendance issues.

Norris has not used a private investigator, McCormick said.

Officials at districts, including at Panama-Buna Vista Union, look at myriad clues to determine if students don’t live in their district, such as excessive tardiness and absences; kids hanging out on campus well before or after school; and when mail sent home is returned.

The most common way Panama officials find out: the kids say so themselves. Panama officials could not discuss Thompson’s case based on pending litigation.

School P-I

Schools Legal Service — and not the districts or school boards themselves — do the private investigator hiring. Agency officials couldn’t immediately disclose the number of times they’ve done so, but said it costs $63 to $75 per hour.

Examples of when it typically calls in investigators include the filing of personal injury claims — to see if a person truly is injured — and to resolve such personnel issues as sexual harassment allegations, Herndon said..

“They investigate objectively using specified techniques,” Herndon said.

Many times those cases are special education-related. Herndon would not comment specifically about Thompson’s case, citing pending litigation and attorney-client privilege.

“A third party comes in handy,” Herndon said. “And it’s not always undercover. For those, it’s really occasional. I wouldn’t say we have people out once a week.”

Panama case

In Thompson’s case, the private investigator was hired after she filed a claim with the California Office of Administrative Hearings special education department. She argued Panama-Buena Vista was not providing “free appropriate public education” for her child, among other things, records show.

Panama officials grew suspicious about whether Thompson was living in the district when she did not provide proof of residence on several occasions, and when she requested mail be sent to a P.O. Box, records show.

In March, Schools Legal Service hired the private investigator to make sure the district wasn’t mandated to provide special education services — which can be expensive and time-consuming, school officials said.

In Norris, educating a special-needs child can cost about $20,000 per year as opposed to about $4,700 for a regular education child.

The private investigator followed Thompson nearly every day from March 14 to May 2, court records show.

Early on, the investigator noted Thompson “appeared extremely paranoid” and was driving in “an erratic manner” from Tevis Junior High.

“She appeared to be conducting counter-surveillance,” the investigator said, according to court documents.

“I didn’t know why they were following me,” Thompson told The Californian. “I didn’t know what was going on. We were scared.”

A second investigator video recorded Thompson arriving at and leaving her apartment, which was less than two miles outside the district and in the Greenfield Union School District.

Thompson said financial difficulties forced her to move out of the district, live in Los Angeles for a few months and then stay locally with a relative before a local organization helped her find an apartment — the one investigators followed her to.

The legal battle has begun and the district won the first round.

Panama-Buena Vista prevailed in the state Office of Administrative Hearings case on Oct. 11, records show. A judge found it provided Thompson’s child adequate services. Thompson’s attorney said that claim was a necessary first step before filing a lawsuit.

The separate emotional distress claim seeks $1 million for “suffered stress and a loss of security in their ability to travel freely without being stalked and spied on.”

Panama-Buena Vista’s school board recently rejected that claim, as is routine. The filing and rejection of a claim are often the precursors to a lawsuit.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on IS your school district following you?

SAIC removes three execs for fraud

McLean-based Science Applications International said it has removed three of its top executives and begun an internal review following a fraud investigation into work the company did for New York City.

http://liarcatchers.com/fraud_investigation.html

The work involved a contract to manage an employment timekeeping system called CityTime. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York has alleged that “a massive and elaborate scheme to defraud the city” corrupted the program, and it charged Gerard Denault, SAIC’s lead project manager on the program, with receiving at least $5 million in illegal kickbacks.

Carl Bell, a chief systems engineer for SAIC, pleaded guilty to multiple charges related to the scheme and receiving millions in kickbacks.

Earlier this year, New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg called on SAIC to reimburse the city for the entire amount it has paid over an 11-year period — more than $600 million — and to pay the costs of the investigation.

Walter P. Havenstein, SAIC’s chief executive, said in a memo to employees Monday that Deborah Alderson, president of the company’s defense solutions group; John Lord, her deputy; and Peter Dube, general manager of the enterprise and mission solutions business, have been removed from their positions and are no longer with the company.

None of the three has been charged with wrongdoing. The three either did not return calls seeking comment or could not be located.

“While we are aware of no evidence that these individuals had any personal involvement in the fraud uncovered in the CityTime program . . . we must maintain the highest standards for all of our employees and for our industry, beginning with our management team,” Havenstein wrote.

SAIC has hired the law firm Gibson Dunn to review its internal policies and practices and Guidepost Solutions to review its response to the controversy.

“These are extraordinary actions, but they are necessary to make SAIC the strongest company it can be,” wrote Havenstein, who announced this month that he will retire from SAIC next year, citing personal reasons.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on SAIC removes three execs for fraud

Make sure your private investigator is licensed

The St. Charles Parish Sheriff’s Office has arrested a man accused of performing unlicensed private investigation work for the St. Charles Parish School Board, a problem the city of New Orleans had run into in 2009. Dwayne Alexander, 44, of New Orleans, turned himself in to Louisiana State Police on Monday and was booked into the Nelson Coleman Correctional Center in Killona with providing contract or private investigator services without possessing a valid license.
He had been wanted since June on a warrant for that charge issued following an investigation by the St. Charles Sheriff’s Office.
The School Board paid Alexander, through his World Wide Detective Agency, $2,685 to investigate a worker’s compensation claim in January, according to an affidavit. Alexander was paid $65 an hour for 34 hours of work for the board, according to his invoice, in addition to mileage and other fees. Alexander’s investigation uncovered no wrongdoing on the part of the employee, said Rochelle Cancienne-Touchard, school district spokeswoman.
Cancienne-Touchard said the School Board was acting on a recommendation made by its third-party administrator, Cannon Cochran Management Services Inc., in 2006 when the school district also used Alexander to investigate a worker’s compensation claim. Cancienne-Touchard said the district did not check to make sure Alexander was licensed.
“Because we worked through our worker’s compensation carrier, we were under the assumption that they did all those checks,” Cancienne-Touchard said regarding his licensing.
But since Alexander had last been used by the School Board in 2006, he had been fired by CCMSI after the company learned he did not have a private investigator’s license. “We used the same number to contact the person as we had in 2006,” Cancienne-Touchard said. “We contacted this person once again, and he did the work obviously without telling us that he no longer worked for them.”
Alexander, who was paid more than $522,000 to investigate worker’s compensation claims for the city of New Orleans during a two-year span, had been fired from CCMSI in 2009 after questions regarding his license were raised by the Metropolitan Crime Commission, a nonprofit watchdog group.
The Metropolitan Crime Commission contacted St. Charles schools Superintendent Rodney Lafon in May, according to the affidavit, at which time Lafon asked the Sheriff’s Office to investigate.
Alexander had been served with a cease and desist order from the Louisiana State Board of Private Investigator Examiners in 2009 preventing him from conducting any type of private investigations and that order was still in effect when he did the work for the School Board, according to the affidavit.
In August, the secretary of state’s office revoked the charter of the World Wide Detective Agency for failing to file an annual report since 2008.
Monday’s arrest is not the first time Alexander has had a run-in with the law.
He was on federal probation at the time he conducted the work for the School Board after pleading guilty to income tax fraud and obstruction of justice for his involvement with a ring of New Orleans attorneys who illegally recruited clients.

http://liarcatchers.com/MatthewPILIc.jpg

Alexander was cited in 2006 by the state Board of Private Investigator Examiners for ripping off Louisiana’s risk manager by plagiarizing another detective’s work and claiming it as his own.
In the 1990’s, Alexander was caught spying on Gov. Mike Foster, who in a well-publicized incident allegedly offered to pay Alexander to be a “double-agent,” to spy on the still-unnamed person or people who had hired him.
In 1988, he was convicted on 17 counts of filing false public records for selling gold jewelry — some of which police later identified as stolen — to pawnshops.
Alexander was released from jail Monday afternoon after posting a $500,000 bond. If convicted, he faces a fine of between $2,000 and $10,000 or three months to a year in jail.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Make sure your private investigator is licensed

Sex offenders need OK to be in Buckeye parks

Registered sex offenders in Buckeye will need written permission from the police chief to be in town’s parks and recreation facilities, following the unanimous passage Tuesday of a new ordinance.

The Safe Park Ordinance is modeled after similar ones passed recently in Irvine, Calif., and Huachuca City in southern Arizona.

The intent of the law is to disrupt sex offenders who are grooming their victims by befriending them in places where children congregate.

http://liarcatchers.com/pedophile_tracking.html

“Most of the sex offenders we have in town are not on probation or parole so there are no other restrictions on their movements,” said Buckeye police Detective Doug Dodge. “The ordinance allows for police action to be taken to disrupt the grooming before it reaches victimization level.”

Sex offenders found on the town’s property without permission would face misdemeanor charges. The maximum penalty is three years probation, six months in jail and a $2,500 fine.

Buckeye Town Councilman Craig Heustis, a grandfather and former police officer and detective, spearheaded the effort to adopt the ordinance. He asked the city to consider it after hearing news reports while in California several months ago that detailed Irvine’s passage of a similar law.

“It’s another tool is all it is,” he said. “But it’s something to basically try to project the kids a little bit more. It’s not something to where the police are going go out and start checking everybody’s ID and arresting everybody out in the parks.”

There are currently 45 registered sex offenders in Buckeye, Dodge said. All of them, regardless of level of risk, would be expected to seek permission to be on town property, including parks, aquatics and recreation centers, open-space preserves, trails and other land and facilities owned or maintained by Buckeye. The ordinance also covers adjacent parking areas to parks.

The proposed law, which went into effect Wednesday, was submitted for legal review before it was voted on.

The town cannot regulate private property, so it would not apply to parks owned by homeowners associations, said Scott Ruby, Buckeye town attorney.

Dodge said the town has records on all the sex offenders who live there. A background check run by officers in the normal course of duty would show the subject’s history as a registered sex offender.

“The officer can start asking questions from there and determine the appropriate action as needed,” he said.

Some reasons that may justify permission to be in the park include registered sex offenders who would vote, attend a religious service or accompany their children.

Buckeye is following a trend when it comes to banning registered sex offenders from parks and playgrounds.

The city council is Los Alamitos, Calif., took the first step this week in approving ordinance nearly identical to Buckeye. Its ordinance was modeled after one passed by Orange County in April. As many as nine other Southern California cities are considering the ban, reports say.

Irvine’s ordinance applies only to sex offenders whose crimes were against children.

Dan Pochoda, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union Arizona, said the ordinance raises constitutional concerns. But courts have upheld laws requiring sex-offender registrations, as well as ones that restrict where they can live and how far they can be from schools and churches.

“The courts certainly have been generally receptive to localities’ attempts to place various restrictions and conditions on various sex offenders,” Pochoda said. “It is concerning because they have already done their time.”

While Buckeye’s ordinance does not provide for it, Dodge said he would notify the town’s registered sex offenders of the new law.

Heustis admits sex offenders are unlikely to seek permission to be in public spaces.

“They probably would not,” he said. “But you know that’s like saying you don’t have permission to carry a gun, but yet you do anyway. You’re violating a law and yet the chances of being caught are probably pretty slim to none. It’s not a catch-all. It’s not out there to cleanse the world.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Private Investigator Lexington | Tagged | Comments Off on Sex offenders need OK to be in Buckeye parks